![]() ![]() A history of racialized opposition to transit has prevented MARTA from establishing strong connections between suburbs and the city. “ reflected a hunger for significant transit expansion within the city limits, and I think that’s why you see disappointment in the project list - because we’re taxing ourselves for more and we’re not getting more yet.”Ītlanta has had a tough time making progress on regional public transit. The voters feel the same way,” says City Councilmember Amir Farokhi, who chairs the council’s transportation committee. “I would have expected much more project completion or active implementation at this point, and I’m not alone. But local officials and residents also worry about MARTA’s ability to execute projects quickly enough to take advantage of the infusion of support for public transit in a historically car-centric city. The paring down of the More MARTA program is partly a reflection of the painful choices that transit agencies all over the country are making as they deal with pandemic-related construction delays, higher material and labor costs, lower ridership and smaller budgets. And the agency recently told the City Council that it will only actively pursue nine of the 17 projects that had been on its priority list. Two light rail routes that were included in the initial list of projects approved by MARTA’s board in 2018 have been switched to bus rapid transit. MARTA is only now breaking ground on its first bus rapid transit expansion since the More MARTA program was approved. Seven years later, little work has been completed and the scope of the program continues to narrow. With other voter-approved funds already going to support MARTA’s operations, the More MARTA Atlanta program was dedicated specifically to capital expansion: new train lines, new bus lines, new streetcar extensions and new stations. The measure was meant to bring in around $2.7 billion for the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) over 40 years through a new half-penny sales tax. In 2016, Atlanta voters approved a plan to dramatically expand public transit service and provide more alternatives to the city’s infamously congested car commute - what a writer at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution once described as “the mundane kind of misery that passes for normal.” Advocates and political leaders worry about the slow pace of progress and its impacts on mobility, housing affordability and public confidence in the More MARTA Atlanta program.It is also pursuing bus rapid transit on two corridors that were originally planned for light rail.MARTA is indefinitely delaying about half the projects that it planned to build with the proceeds of a sales tax approved by voters in 2016.I mean that was very reflective of things that were trying to be done in the 70s, but never really panned out most places. “It would whisk you over to the Convention Center and other parts of downtown. “So you could exit the MARTA subway train, go upstairs, get on the people mover,” VanSickle says. In the 1990s, the Atlanta Housing Authority tore down the Perry Homes units to build new mixed-income apartments. It would have been the last stop on the Green Line. The collection includes sketches for train stations that were never built ─ such as the Perry Homes transit station. “I mean you kind of see the evolution of where the lines could have gone from the very beginning when they were just the first drawings all the way up to formation of this new agency that was created to build and operate it.” “These are actually the original documents detailing the decisions that we made,” Vansickle says. He said the collection tells the story of how MARTA began and why stations look the way they do today. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |